RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:48:02 -0700
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Well, I hate to agree with Bill.... so I won't, not entirely.

Feel free to vent your spleens over this issue. Keep in mind it is not
our decision. If Glen was here he would say it is inevitable. I would
agree with that. Our debate should revolve around the best way to
contribute to its success.

It is not just that it is expensive it is that doing it wrong from the
beginning will raise the cost exponentially. We should be there as a
united voice saying this is how you do it.

Oh yea, I forgot, we don't agree on anything.

So yes Bill it is coming
Yes Bob the cost will be passed on to the consumer

So what

Anybody out there got a clue how to make this scheme work efficiently?

Chris Flynn

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2