Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:29:47 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
<many users don't approach classification the same way that records managers
do,>
<the user has to understand the classification system well enough to know
how to match the information to that framework.>
Well in a functional classification scheme (which is the way we do it these
days - ISO 15489) the users, not the records manager, decide in the first
place how the scheme looks - because the scheme REFLECTS the documented
approved business processes and the higher level documented approved
functions of the organization, the scheme doesn't CREATE a way of ordering
processes and functions. The records manager doesn't set business processes
nor their relationships to each other nor to top-level function(s) of the
organization (which are dictated by the organization's mandate). Those
documenting activities are standard requirements of organizations (ISO 9001)
- not the records manager's battle. The business process approvers must
explain these process and function connections to the records manager. This
means approvers must be high enough up the food chain to understand how all
activities (for which records are the evidence) "hang together" to support
the raison d'etre of the organization. Then the records manager creates the
facets in the scheme to reflect these relationships. This creates the
context that makes records meaningful (a functional approach means that the
context is the meaning of records, not the content of individual records
themselves). The scheme is not hierarchical, it's faceted - exceptions or
"problems" in grouping records can be handled because facets can be used
anywhere in the scheme as needed to properly capture context. For example,
if any given activity or process has it's own HR or finance function then
those categories are allowed anywhere- they are not strictly contained
within HR or Finance top-level functions.
Maureen Cusack, M.I.St.
http://www.maureencusack.net
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|