Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 18:03:12 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
In-Reply-To: |
<004301c643db$f6e32d20$6601a8c0@uma> |
Organization: |
Jesse Wilkins at IMERGE Consulting |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Linda,
Just playing devil's advocate....
1. How would auditors or opposing counsel know these were not scanned from
the originals? If you have a process that, say, marks the photocopies as
such, I could see that - but you could document that process. That does
speak to a deeper issue, perhaps...
2. If the originals are fragile or damaged you'd have to photocopy them
anyway....
The thing I tell people in my consulting practice and in my CDIA+ classes is
to document the general process and procedures followed. I don't see a
significant difference between scanning a valid photocopy and the original -
after all, visual quality issues notwithstanding, we make copies of copies
as well as copies of originals....
My tuppence from snowy Colorado,
Jesse Wilkins
CDIA+, EDP, LIT/ERM, ICP, ERMs, ECMs
IMERGE Consulting
[log in to unmask]
(303) 574-1455 office
(303) 484-4142 fax
Visit www.imergeconsult.com/ermworkshops.html for scheduled AIIM ERM
workshops
-----Original Message-----
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|