Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:21:48 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>>> Please read the confidentiality statement below <<<<
<<<Does anyone out there in Listserv land know where I can find a US state
or federal citation defining a time span regarding a retention period of
"forever" or "permanent"?>>>
No disrespect Robert--am I just being naïve again, or is this absurd? Can't we just rely on the definition we'd find in any dictionary? Why do people have to take a nice word like "forever" and abuse it? If the legislatures in California and Virginia decided forever means 500 years, then why can't the retention period be "500 years?" It's not like people won't have time to change their mind!
Gary L. Grieme
Records Manager
[log in to unmask]
__________________________________________________
Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged,
confidential and covered by the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, distribute,
or reproduce this transmission.
If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
notify us immediately of the error by return email and please
delete the message from your system.
Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the U. S. Internal
Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this
communication (including any attachments) is not intended
to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of (i) avoiding
penalties imposed under the U. S. Internal Revenue Code
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
person any tax-related matter.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.
http://www.rkmc.com
__________________________________________________
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|