RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:12:53 -0500
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
I have recently experienced bounced back e-mails that I sent to individuals
in corporations when their internal e-mail filters detected an SS# in an
e-mail attachment. The attachment was a requested standard IRS Tax Form 1009
(in which an SS# is required) that I had scanned into a PDF file image. The
e-mail bounced back to me said that the e-mail I sent could not enter their
e-mail system, because it had an SS# or other personally identifiable
information.

It would be ironic if SS#s are so sensitive that we might be reduced to
slower paper-based work processes in some instances, simply because of the
difficulty of having our privacy/security issues addressed in a high tech
environment!

John


********************************
John T. Phillips
MSLS, CRM, CDIA, FAI
Electronic Records Management
Consulting, Education, Research
Information Technology Decisions
www.infotechdecisions.com
865-966-9413


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Peter Kurilecz
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Text of Press Release - Limiting Public Access to Property
Record Documents

On 2/27/07, Daniel W. Noonan, MLS, CDIA+ <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The irony is that SSNs were never supposed to be in land record 
> documents as they have no requirement  for them.

and worse yet the SSN was not supposed to be used as an identifier.
This was written into the law. I wonder when it changed. For all the
arguments proposed against a national ID card by the left, right and center
I have yet to see any argument or discussion from those groups calling for
the rescission of the SSN as a national ID. And if you don't think that it
is being used as a national ID then ask yourself why there is a push to have
parents apply for a SSN for a newborn.
http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10023.html  while it is voluntary according to the
SSA website the IRS requires that every child have a SSN if you are going to
claim them as a deduction
http://pregnancy.about.com/cs/newbornbabies/a/aassn.htm

Hopefully the heightened awareness about identity theft and the role played
by the SSN will cause legislators and government officials to rethink how
the SSN is collected and used.


--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2