Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2007 07:28:16 +1000 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mike
Where I used to be: 4,500 staff, highly decentralised, no central file
store: 6 staff - 3 RMers, 3 pushing trolleys
Where I am now: 3,500 staff, less decentralised, building up a central file
store: 10 staff, 5 RMers, 5 pushing trolleys
But it depends heavily on corporate structure, geographic and functional
spread, the extent to which you go fully electronic etc etc. I've seen these
questions over many years now on several listservs and my analysis is there
is no standard, and the only pattern is less and less staff for more and
more work.
Cheers
Glenn
Glenn Sanders MRMA
[log in to unmask]
Australia
These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked
and they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck and Co and
Glenn". Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|