RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date:
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:24:25 -0700
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
From:
L Carpenter <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I was curious about something I heard today from an offsite storage vendor.
The vendor indicated that some records centers are  stacking and storing 4
boxes high. It was also indicated that 4 high is "industry standard".

I'm currently without my copy of the Robeck et all book, the ARMA records
center handbook, and, of course the ARMA Records Storage Task Force
documentation. But, I don't recall that 4 high has ever been an industry
"standard".  Maybe when items are on pallets and shrink wrapped, 4 high may
be "standard" (e.g. 40 per pallet), but in terms of items stored on shelves,
 I'm recalling that the optimum is no more than 3 high on shelves, but that
2 high is preferable.

Anyway, I wanted to see what the list serv members think about 4 high
storage being "standard" and if their storage vendors are doing this.

Laurie Carpenter, CRM
Burbank, CA

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2