Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:06:02 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Maybe this is the first step in preserving CA Government Electronic Public
> Records?
>
> -kimo
>
>
> AB1926 was just introduced to the California legislature and pertains to
> standards for maintaining court records. Below is a synopsis of the bill
> and a link to review a PDF version. Since most of us deal with public
> records, please share any thoughts or concerns you might have regarding
> this
> bill.
>
> AB 1926, as introduced, Evans. Court records: preservation
> guidelines.
>
> Existing law provides that court records may be preserved in any
> form, including electronic forms, as specified.
> This bill would additionally authorize courts to create and maintain
> records in electronic forms, as specified.
>
> Existing law requires that court records be preserved in accordance
> with standards or guidelines adopted by the American National
> Standards Institute or the Association for Information and Image
> Management.
>
> This bill would delete these provisions and would instead require the
> Judicial Council to adopt rules to govern the creation, maintenance,
> reproduction, and preservation of court records, and would require that
> records be preserved in accordance with these rules.
>
> Under existing law, “retain permanently” means that the original
> court record shall never be transferred or destroyed.
> This bill would revise this definition to mean that the record shall be
> maintained
>
working link
http://goo.gl/8PFg
>
>
>
>
>
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|