And this is a big reason why I have not joined the Information Governance
bandwagon.  Everybody seems to have a different view of what IG is.  I've
also seen a couple of difference versions of the IG model.  If I showed any
of these to my senior management their eyes would quickly glaze over and I
would immediately lose them.

For all of the knocking of records management (PK posted a blog yesterday
in which the author stated that "records management is dead") at least it
is fairly easy to describe; the concepts have been around a long time and
most individuals can understand what records management is fairly
quickly.

Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Virginia Beach, VA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco


*"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep
moving." -- Albert Einstein*


On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Robert Smallwood <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Glad to see my friend and colleague Thornton May weighing in on IG. He
> highlights the biggest problem with IG, which is having a clear definition.
> This was borne out in a recent survey of large law firms by ILTA as
> reported
> by the IG Initiative:
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]