RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Laino, Tony" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:01:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
I have to agree with Gerry that we should not let go of the concept of the
"official record".
In addition to Gerry's pinpoint reasoning, I might add that most records
management applications allow for the "registration" of documents.  This is
done for ownership, authentication and version-control purposes, to name a
few.

Tony Laino,CRM
Manager, Consulting Services
TAB Professional Services
Toll Free: 1-800-243-6547 x.264

-----Original Message-----
From: Van Houten, Gerry (MGS)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 12:25 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "Official Record" definition


Well, I most emphatically disagree with the idea that you should avoid using
or defining the term "official record." Multiple copies can and do exist in
any media -- not just hardcopy.

It is very important, if not vital, to establish who or what office is
responsible for a particular record. This link between a record and
responsibility for it establishes what record is official and distinguishes
it, for example, from copies held by persons or offices for reference
purposes. The person or office responsible for the official record is the
person or office that is responsible for its retention and disposition as
determined in a records retention schedule.

Gerry van Houten
Information Policy Adviser
Archives of Ontario


-----Original Message-----
From: mwhaider [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: January 4, 2006 11:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "Official Record" definition


Kathy,
I suggest you avoid using (or defining) the term "official record".  Perhaps
it was a useful term when documents were typed with multiple carbon copies
and it was best to retain the most durable, but generally it simply confuses
the issue.
Mary Haider

Mary W. Haider
Records & Information Manager

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2