RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jones, Virginia" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:25:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
One of Larry's points - <Inconsistent application or retention policy> - is the big argument for applying retention to data here at Waterworks.  If we have a retention  schedule and apply it to only SOME of the records covered by a retention series, then we are invalidating our retention policy. In order to avoid this, we must either keep EVERYTHING forever (paper, photos, data, email, surveillance tapes, audio tapes, backup tapes, etc.) OR apply the retention to everything.  With cost factors, data breach factors, privacy issues, and so on, we have determined it is much better to apply the retention to everything.

Ginny Jones 
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI) 
Records Manager 
Information Technology Division 
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities 
Newport News, VA 
[log in to unmask] 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2