Buckets are for milk, grain, or paint...., not records. Having said that, I
do believe in large, functional record series.
At SFO waiting for my flight.
I hate paper!
Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Todd Gilliom <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> As for standardized terms, here's another screwball.
>
> "Record Series" used to mean a group of records that share certain
> characteristics of function, arrangement, purpose, and content.
>
> But now, with big bucket retention -- it seems all they have to share is a
> retention period and people want to call it a record series.
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
--
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|