First of all, I'm not an attorney and I think you'll need one for a proper interpretation of this opinion.  What I believe however is that the Court is considering the question of an email correspondence being considered a contract for purposes of obligating the parties to whatever it is they agreed to, not as a documentation of a transaction (because it could very well be that).







--
Laura Steinberg, Records Manager

Epsten Grinnell & Howell APC
Attorneys at Law
San Diego | Murietta | Palm Desert
9980 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92121
Phone: (858) 527-0111  Fax: (858) 527-1531
Visit Our Website: http://www.epsten.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message contains information which may be confidential or legally
privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or are authorized to receive
e-mail for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone
the message or any information contained in the message or any attachment.
If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by
reply e-mail and delete the message any attachments, and destroy all
hard copies. Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]