If you look at who they are and what they do http://www.awcnet.org/Home.aspx
I have a feeling this isn't an option Fred.

Someone will have to have a starting point and based on how they are
structured, there is a continually rolling "Who's in Charge"? with this
organization... and with them being a private, non-profit, non-partisan
corporation operating under a 990, records play a big part in documenting
how funds are received and spent, how decisions are reached and how an
organization with this broad of a charter functions.

Larry

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Frederic Grevin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I am going to heretically disagree with some of this conversation.
>
> IMHO, I do not think it is a good investment of time and resources to
> conduct detailed, document-centric inventories in order to develop a
> business function-based retention schedule. It is also not necessary. The
> business function-based retention schedule will be workable if you have
> only an "illustrative" list of record types, as opposed to an exhaustive
> list.
>
> This DOES require re-thinking how retention works in practice as well as
> in theory.
>
> Let the storm descend !
>
> Fred
> --------------------------------------
> Frederic J. Grevin
> [log in to unmask]
> Office: 212-312-3903
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



-- 
*Lawrence J. Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]