On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Frederic Grevin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
> IMHO, I do not think it is a good investment of time and resources to
> conduct detailed, document-centric inventories in order to develop a
> business function-based retention schedule. It is also not necessary. The
> business function-based retention schedule will be workable if you have
> only an "illustrative" list of record types, as opposed to an exhaustive
> list.
>
> This DOES require re-thinking how retention works in practice as well as
> in theory.
>

I somewhat agree with Fred. a detailed work analysis is not necessary but
one can do a high level one that identifies the records created, used and
maintained by the process. and that includes the records that it receives
and the ones it sends out. It can also identify the systems that the work
process interacts with


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]