RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:24:27 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Of interest to me is when you read this, there is ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION in
any of these 'successful implementations' of how they addressed meeting the
requirements in Exhibit 53 to ensure all records generated are captured and
managed for the required retention periods, including any conversion or
migration potentially required based on those retention periods.

Weren't we JUST DISCUSSING how the US Government is doing on Electronic
Records?


The Government Accountability Office (GAO) today released the following
reports, testimony, and correspondence:

LETTER REPORT

Information Technology: Critical Factors Underlying Successful Major
Acquisitions, GAO-12-7, October 21 (57 pages)
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-7
Highlights - http://www.gao.gov/highlights/d127high.pdf



Larry

-- 
*Lawrence J. Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2