RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"A.S.E. Fairfax" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 14:25:03 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
Actually the term Records Retention Schedule is often correctly used to cover both types of retention and disposition instructions.  NARA's schedules are made up this way, and take a look at the State of Washington website and schedules:

http://www.sos.wa.gov/archives/RecordsRetentionSchedules.aspx

Elizabeth

A.S. Elizabeth Fairfax, MA,CA
ACA Certified Archivist/Public Records Professional
Island County Archives, Records and Information Management Program
P.O. Box 5000
1 NE 7th Street
Coupeville, WA   98239
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
phone: 360-240-5569
fax: 360-240-5553

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry Medina
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 11:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Forms Placement On Retention Schedule

There seems to be a bit of confusion here between the purpose of an RRS
"Records Retention Schedule" and a RIDS "Records and Disposition Schedule"
http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/cioprod/documents/1324-10.pdf


On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Todd Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Good Morning,
>
> We have a list of 100+ numbered, operational forms which are often used by
> multiple groups (i.e. Corrosion, Measurement, Pipeline Compliance, OSHA
> Safety, etc.). All forms are currently accounted for through a forms matrix
> which contains information about who the responsible office is for
> retention,
> where and how long they should be retained, etc. In building our Retention
> Schedule, I would like to list these forms under the function they
> support. I
> would also like to keep the forms matrix as it is a handy tool and directly
> connected to our O&M manual. I guess I'm curious to know how other
> companies handle operational forms that cross functional lines. Do you
> only list
> them under the function they support, do you list them separately on a type
> of forms matrix, or do you manage a hybrid structure?
> Any insight is appreciated.
> Happy Holidays!
>
> Todd Johnson, CRM, ERMm
>
>


-- 
*Lawrence J. Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2