 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:27:49 -0800 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Debbie,
No. I have never heard of that instance.
Erratic or capricious deviation from an established records retention schedule is another matter.
"Selective" destruction or retention is where risk is created.
Mike
--- On Mon, 12/12/11, Holly, Debi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
From: Holly, Debi <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Keeping records too long
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Monday, December 12, 2011, 12:17 PM
We all know that proper records management includes disposition of records when they have met their retention. We also know that if we keep records longer than their retention period, we open our agencies/companies up to court sanctions.
My question for this group is: Do you know of a specific case(s) where the company/agency was sanctioned for keeping records longer than they should?
You can reply to the list or privately. Thank you!
Debi Holly
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
