RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
mwhaider <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:24:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Yes, Peter I agree.  I have never used a minimum or maximum concept for the
final retention policy.  I have used the concept in developing the records
retention schedule.  As you indicated, the legal research provides the
minimum; and, any additional time required for good business practices is
added when reviewed and approved by the "organization" (committee,
executives etc.).  The retention policy should not leave any discretionary
decisions by users.  When there are issues or concerns raised by users, I
recommend using a documented "Hold" until a decision is made.  These
practices will enable the retention and disposition processes for both
paper and electronic records, and provides consistency for all record media.
Mary

>
>
Mary W. Haider, MBA, CRM
Records & Information Manager and Consultant
[log in to unmask]
865-983-1371

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2