Best line of the order ... Page 20 ... "In short, KPMG is hoist on its own petard." Sent from my iPhone On Feb 4, 2012, at 12:19 AM, PeterK <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > KPMG Loses E-Discovery Appeal in 'Pippins' Labor Case > > Auditing firm KPMG has lost its appeal of a controversial e-discovery > ruling in the *Pippins v. > KPMG<http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/legaltechnology/Pippins_v_KPMG_Order_20120203.pdf> > * labor case. > > KPMG, one of the Big Four in its field, wanted to sample 100 hard drives > for e-discovery. Lawyers for Pippins won a November 2011 ruling to use all > available drives, which sparked a debate among e-discovery watchers -- how > much data preservation is reasonable? The sides appeared close to a > compromise last month, but no deal was > reached<http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202537994548> > . > > > http://bit.ly/we9ZJA > > Source: > http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541365593 > See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/we9ZJA+ > Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web: > http://bitly.com/pages/sidebar > > List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html > Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance > To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message. > mailto:[log in to unmask] List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message. mailto:[log in to unmask]
