Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:35:49 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Julie:
The question arises related to both structured and unstructured data; however, crafting the definition becomes more difficult related to the unstructured data which generally resides either in SharePoint or on file shares. In communicating retention compliance requirements, we want to be system agnostic. By having a definition for SoR, we will do not limit our internal organization from using their preferred "system" as long as it meets the requirements of a system of record.
I hope that clarifies our need.
Thanks,
Carol
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julie J. Colgan
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 9:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Definition for Systems of Record
Hi Carol,
I think it might help if we understood what your issues are with the
current scenario? What is it that you are trying to achieve?
Best,
Julie
--
Julie J. Colgan, CRM
[log in to unmask]
http://twitter.com/juliecolgan
http://www.linkedin.com/in/juliejcolgan
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|