call me old-fashioned but I always believed that the destruction of the
records was approved when the retention schedule was approved. The
destruction authorization process was put in place to make sure that
records needed for an audit or litigation were not inadvertently destroyed.
At one former employer we reversed the process. Instead of starting with
the business unit we started with the Tax people then went to Legal and
then the business unit. What the business you reviewed were those records
not subject to either a litigation or tax hold, as a result they were much
more likely to authorize destruction since they had no business need for
the records
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Glen,
>
> We consider it a best practice to implement pre-approval for destruction
> in accordance with your retention schedule.
>
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Dallas, Texas
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.orghttp://twitter.com/RAINbytehttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbytehttp://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
