RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:30:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Just as important the organization needs to document that 1) this is their
process and 2) they are following it...

Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Virginia Beach, VA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco

Sometimes the questions are complicated
and the answers are simple.
                       Dr. Seuss


On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:24 AM, John Montana <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I know organizations that do it, chiefly because data volumes make reviews
> meaningless and sign-offs completely unfeasible.  However, I agree that
> this isn't a policy that should initiate from RIM.  The organization as an
> entity needs to decide that this is how it will do things, and everybody
> has to be on board with living with the consequences, whether voluntarily
> or by executive fiat.  RIM's simply not in a position most times to either
> get the universal buy-in or issue the fiat.
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2