RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ben Greene <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:22:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Curious to understand from records managers at companies who have 
conducted dependent eligibility audits (whether internally or through a 3rd 
party) the following:  did you consider the audit an actual audit carrying a 
longer (6 yr plus) retention period or did you consider it a "project" which 
typically carries a much shorter period?  

Technically speaking I can see the argument for both sides, as it could be an 
audit to confirm compliance with procedures, but am inclined to lean toward it 
being part of a project.

Thoughts from anyone?

Thanks.

Ben Greene, CRM
Minneapolis, MN

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2