Maybe our colleague Mr. Montana will weigh in on this

Larry
[log in to unmask]

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> I'll have to disagree with my esteemed colleague on this one. while a
> plaintiff's attorney may see such a statement as being the indication of
> gold strike, I would prefer to see some police/procedure clearly stated.
> yes it could be part of the a disaster/business continuity, but who's to
> say that an employee didn't inadvertently shred some records that shouldn't
> or that an external drive hadn't been backed before it got run over by a
> truck? Accidents happen.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok, so I'M NOT... but if I WERE an attorney and I was trying a case
> against
> > a firm that had 'inadvertently' destroyed records and I found something
> > documented in their policies/procedures on how to handle records
> destroyed
> > that shouldn't have been???   Well, I think my work here would be
> > completed...
>

-- 
*Lawrence J. Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]