Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:03:27 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would say #1 is worse. Mostly because when you put an innocent person in
jail, even if they're later proven innocent, the conviction hangs over
their heads for the rest of their life, plus very few people come out of
jail the same.
And I would say Mary that destroying a misfiled record is the worse.
Keeping misinformation is frustrating but document destruction can lead to
major issues at the company.
Jennie Dubin-Rhodin, MLS
On Feb 5, 2016 11:56 AM, "mwhaider" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Of course the answer is #1. If you have enough evidence to find someone
> guilty then you are not sending an innocent person to jail. If you don't
> have enough evidence to find someone guilty you can't send them to jail.
> Most likely there are a lot of guilty people hanging around our
> neighborhoods because there was not enough evidence. On the other hand,
> the recent Bonnie and Clyde duo had been sentenced to probation rather than
> jail and now look at the result.
>
> And in the RIM world is it worse to delete a record that was misclassified
> or keep a record that has misinformation (drafts, old versions, opinions,
> gossip - ie. email)?
>
> Mary
>
> Mary W. Haider, MBA, CRM
> Records & Information Manager and Consultant
> [log in to unmask]
> 865-983-1371
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|