Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:34:25 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am guessing that based on your email address you work for a city in
Texas. Have you talked with any of the records consultants at the
Texas State Library? I haven't worked in Texas local government in
years but from my recollection there isn't anything in the regluations
that would prevent you from implementing your proposal. But I think
it might be wise to run by them as well.
Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Radnor, PA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco
"Learn from others whom have walked the path before you,
but be smart enough to know when to cut your own trail."
Narciso Rodriguez
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mark H. Hoover <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The City I work for requires that developers submit 4 sets of their building plans for review. At the end of the review process, one copy becomes the official record copy and the others become convenience copies. My question is, should we require that the convenience copies go through our formal destruction process or is it acceptable for the individual departments to dispose of the copies as they see fit?
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|