Regarding being offended by a critial comment... Someone or some people did not actually read the content and took offense jumping on a bandwagon. Then noone answered what is asked in the last paragraph at http://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0503c&L=recmgmt-l&F=&S=&P=7072 No vilification. No contempt. No intense vicious ill will in the content. No ad hominem. Of course anybody could perceive otherwise beyond intent to comment about a lack of a cooperative spirit that people have remarked on generally as being the inspiration and mission of our exchanges contributed to the forum threads. Things that are asked contribute focus to concepts. Asking about something itself can be as much a contributed thing as are the responses. Supervisory and managerial practices can be a lot sharper than any comment about an uncooperative spirit of a particular response. Taking to extreme did less to contribute than would have answering to what is raised in a more neutral manner. The points raised pertinent to the actual comment afterward did not further enlighten the matter being addressed already as the premise of the comment in this round. I am interested in how things are done and the background behind how things are done. I know people who ask about that all the time over and over and repetitively to learn more about what they want to know. Or to have emphasized what might not be entirely crystal clear. We have seminars where people are invited explain how they do what they do. I continue to be interested in the particular search terms and the particular search engines for the compiled Records and Archives in the News as a case study in how to do something as well as that enterprise has been most useful to our http://www.sec.state.ma.us/arc/arcrmu/rmuidx.htm Massachusetts Public Records Division, our custodians of records and our records requesters. Obviously, as a model it could be applied many ways that would improve communication among the profession and related professions about other subjects, if there were more openness and explicit recounting of how the compiling works. Case studies do that. Some learn by example. Different people learn in different ways. If any of you nice folks out there would, please let me know if you do have any ideas on what is asked in the last paragraph http://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0503c&L=recmgmt-l&F=&S=&P=7072 List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance