Ginny, Yes we all know that the statement in question is completely unacceptable and it raises more questions than it attempts to answer. But you do not live in a Starlin's USSR, just make a note in your diary to avoid using low cost, ineffective vendors and support a vendor who actually wants your business enough to do it right. You can do it comrade. Gerard On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:26:16 -0400, Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >I received a reply from the author. He stated his understanding was >"that the data in question dated from 2000-2003, so data privacy was the >bigger issue here. My guess is this was more about archiving to meet >regulatory compliance than DR" > >While the particular Bank of America and Ameritrade tapes may have been >older, I am still concerned that IM or the author did not address the >contingency loss issue. > > >Ginny Jones >(Virginia A. Jones, CRM) >Records Manager >Information Technology Division >Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities >Newport News, VA >[log in to unmask] List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance