Most of the Federal courts went to letter size back in the 1980s. As I
recall, state courts in Florida went to letter size shortly thereafter. I
am not sure about other states.
David A. Jenks
Government Operations Consultant I
Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written
communications to or from state officials regarding state business are
considered to be public records and will be made available to the public and
the media upon request. Therefore, your e-mail message may be subject to
public disclosure.
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Michael Pemberton [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 11:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Costs of using legal size versus regular size paper
It's a combination of costs from equipment and filing supplies as
well as space. As the courts move to accept "normal" size paper, the
costs of more specialized sizes will, I believe, will go up
further. Someone who remembers more about ARMA's Eliminate
Legal-size Files may recall more detail.
Mike
At 11:29 AM 8/1/2005, Gary L. Grieme wrote:
> >>>> Please read the confidentiality statement below <<<<
>
>I like the brevity of the response, but you may want to back it up with
>some studies or data or a few words on how you arrived at 25%. If it's
>simply based on space saved, wouldn't the number be 20% since you're
>going from 15" containers to 12"?
>
>Gary L. Grieme
>Records Manager
>Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.
>Minneapolis, MN
>612-349-8538
>[log in to unmask]
>
> >>> [log in to unmask] 8/1/2005 9:48:32 AM >>>
>
>25%.
>
>Mike
>
>At 09:51 AM 8/1/2005, Mottern.John wrote:
> >Does anyone know how much money is saved by using regular sized
>paper,
> >files and folders and as opposed legal size paper, files and
>folders?
> >Thanks.
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>
>Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged,
>confidential and covered by the Electronic Communications
>Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521.
>
>If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, distribute,
>or reproduce this transmission.
>
>If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
>notify us immediately of the error by return email and please
>delete the message from your system.
>
>Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the U. S.
>Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this
>communication (including any attachments) is not intended
>to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of (i) avoiding
>penalties imposed under the U. S. Internal Revenue Code
>or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
>person any tax-related matter.
>
>Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
>
>Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.
>http://www.rkmc.com
>__________________________________________________
>
>List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
