RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gordy Hoke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Gordy Hoke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:31:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> I'm currently going through MoReq2 and I can say that it would be very
>difficult IMNSHO to become certified against MoReq2. it is not organized
>like DOD5015 which has ll the mandatory requirements in Chapter 2. MoReq2
>identifies requirements as testable, partially testable and not testable.
>you read that right 'not testable' how can you have a requirement if you
>can't test against it?
>>-- 
>Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
>[log in to unmask]
>Richmond, Va
>
Peter, thanks for your response.
I agree with and share your "not-so-humble" opinion.  The volume and granularity of MoReq2's questions is one obstacle.  The "testability" is another.
In fairness, MoReq2 recognizes that it is difficult to test for upper limits of capacity and that user friendliness is subjective.

Regardless of its limitations, MoReq2 can be extremely helpful/useful.  Vendors of enterprise solutions for RIM would do well to aspire to meeting its challenges.

Gordy
Gordon E.J. Hoke, CRM
http://PositivelyRIM.blogspot.com

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2