"Dog ate my emails" no defense against spoliation sanction - Lexology On a motion for spoliation sanctions, it makes no difference that a party destroyed emails without “malevolent” purpose. For a sanctions motion to be granted, it is necessary only to demonstrate that the evidence was destroyed deliberately. In an article, August 19, 2013, titled “Sanctions Imposed for Non-Malevolent Destruction of Emails,” the New York Law Journal<http://www.toxictortlitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Sanctions%20Imposed%281%29.pdf> reported on a decision handed down by the Hon. Shira Scheindlin in the Southern District of New York on August 15, 2013 in *Sekisui Medical America v. Hart<http://www.toxictortlitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Sekisui%20American%20Corp_%20v_%20Hart.pdf> *, 1:12-cv-03479, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115533 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). http://bit.ly/18tZL1b Source: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5f42c466-3f6f-4108-9f65-d7813fc6cc0a See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/18tZL1b+ Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web: http://bitly.com/pages/sidebar List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message. mailto:[log in to unmask]
