I've been biting my lip and am not really interest in starting a
firefight again but the list has been pretty quiet lately...

So what you are saying is that an IGers (for a lack of a better term)
is a jack of all trades and master of none.  I would be interested in
knowing how many IGers are experts let alone perform all of the
functions you identify.

To be an effective RIMer (my current job anyway) I have to have
knowledge of all these disciplines, some more than others.  I have to
look at the big picture (strategic) as well as all of the operations
(tactical.)  I view all of these groups as stakeholders and must be
able to speak their language.  I also communicate with them - they
with me as well.

This goes back to previous discussions we have had on this topic - IG
is essentially in the eyes of the beholder.  Sort of like trying to
grab jello from a punch bowl.

Thank goodness it is hump day.

Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Radnor, PA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco

"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your
balance you must keep moving." -- Albert Einstein


On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Robert Smallwood
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The Clinton email story has been all over the media the last couple of weeks. The scenario
> involves a number of interrelated issues: information technology, privacy, information
> security, records management (RM), legal issues, risk, and business issues.
>
> Guess what?
>
> These all happen to be components of the Information Governance Reference Model. What
> the whole modern world is talking about are Information Governance (IG) issues.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]