Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:28:38 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
They need not be mutually exclusive, but the metadata fields also need not
be based on retention concerns. A small portion of the metadata might be
linked to a retention schedule, but the remainder could and often does have
little to do with records management per se and much more to do with the
day-to-day operational needs for the information.
By the way, the nice thing about computers is that with full-text indexing,
metadata, or both, that "deep bucket-searching" is done by a computer at
millions of searches per second, not by human hands and wetware at seconds
(to millions of seconds?!) per search.
Jesse Wilkins
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|