RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 May 2017 07:47:08 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I agree with Steve Whitaker's approach here - if you have a retention
schedule, and you follow it consistently, why would you create records to
document destruction of records? Or even keep metadata relating to same?
Seems like it opens up a door for someone who doesn't understand records
management to question your disposition decisions. I know I'm in the
minority in this thread. I also expect/hope/wonder whether everyone doing
em with physical records is doing so consistently with electronic records
as well...and if you're not keeping your certificates of destruction
permanently, at some point don't you have to create certificates of
destruction to document destruction of your certificates of destruction?

If I did have to deal with certificates of destruction I'd go for as short
a period of time as possible - certainly not permanent.

My .02 on a GORGEOUS Colorado morning,

Jesse Wilkins, CIP, CRM, IGP
Denver, CO
Director, Professional Development
AIIM
Work: [log in to unmask]
Permanent: [log in to unmask]
blog: http://informata.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jessewilkins

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2